'That Annoys Judges': How a Miami Lawyer Clinched a $168,000 …

Feb 8, 2022 · News 'That Annoys Judges': How a Miami Lawyer Clinched a $168,000 Attorney-Fee Award U.S. District Judge Jose E. Martinez awarded a six-figure payday to Robert …

$168000
OFF

'That Annoys Judges': How A Miami Lawyer Clinched A $168,000 …

2 weeks from now

Feb 8, 2022 · News 'That Annoys Judges': How a Miami Lawyer Clinched a $168,000 Attorney-Fee Award U.S. District Judge Jose E. Martinez awarded a six-figure payday to Robert …

law.com

$168000
OFF

'That Annoys Judges': How A Miami... - Daily Business Review

2 weeks from now

Feb 8, 2022 · 'That Annoys Judges': How a Miami Lawyer Clinched a $168,000 Attorney-Fee Award

facebook.com

$11
OFF

Miami Judge Approves Shaq's $11 Million Settlement To Resolve …

2 weeks from now

13 hours ago · A Miami federal judge approved an $11 million settlement created by basketball star Shaquille O'Neal for injured investors in the Astrals Project nonfungible tokens and GLXY …

law.com

FAQs about 'That Annoys Judges': How a Miami Lawyer Clinched a $168,000 … Coupon?

Did judge Alberto Milian fail to review judicial conduct rules?

Photo: AM Holt/ALM The JQC said the judge admitted he failed to review the judicial conduct rules prior to issuing his order. Miami-Dade Circuit criminal court Judge Alberto Milian faces a public reprimand following an investigation that determined he inappropriately commented on a motion to disqualify himself from a case. ...

Why is judge Alberto Milian facing a public reprimand?

Miami-Dade Circuit criminal court Judge Alberto Milian faces a public reprimand following an investigation that determined he inappropriately commented on a motion to disqualify himself from a case. The recommendation for the reprimand comes from the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission's investigative panel. ...

What did Judge Milian say about the allegations alleged?

Judge Milian passed on the truth of the facts alleged, stating: “The allegations alleged are not true. The Motion is hereby GRANTED.” (See Exhibit 1. attached to these Findings and Recommendation). While the Commission might ordinarily attribute such an order to mere legal error, or, very charitably, amisinterpretation of the Rule, and not rising ...

Was Judge Milian's conduct intentional?

The JQC's Findings and Recommendation of Discipline read, "While the Commission might ordinarily attribute such an order to mere legal error, or, very charitably, a misinterpretation of the Rule, and not rising to the level of ethical misconduct requiring discipline, the Commission believes that Judge Milian's conduct here was intentional." ...

Did Jacob's criticism erode public confidence in the judiciary?

An ethics expert previously stated that Jacobs brand of criticism eroded public confidence in the judiciary. In a first in The Florida Bar’s prosecution of an attorney, a Miami lawyer filed a First-Amendment Anti-SLAPP motion near midnight Wednesday to the Florida Supreme Court, asking the justices to dismiss his client’s ethics case. ...

Did Judge Milian take responsibility for his conduct?

The investigative panel said Milian took responsibility. "Judge Milian has admitted that his immediate responsibility for his conduct. Judge Milian has admitted that his conduct was inappropriate and violated the Canons," the report concluded. ...