Woman Wins $417 Million in Suit Linking Baby Powder to Her

Aug 22, 2017 · Thousands of women have claimed Johnson & Johnson's baby powder causes ovarian cancer, and the latest suit was awarded the highest damages yet. But the company …

$417
OFF

Woman Wins $417 Million In Suit Linking Baby Powder To Her

2 weeks from now

Aug 22, 2017 · Thousands of women have claimed Johnson & Johnson's baby powder causes ovarian cancer, and the latest suit was awarded the highest damages yet. But the company …

vice.com

$417
OFF

Johnson And Johnson Archives - VICE

2 weeks from now

Apr 14, 2021 · The Many Women Suing Johnson & Johnson. 10.30.17. By Amy Martyn. Identity Woman Wins $417 Million in Suit Linking Baby Powder to Her Ovarian Cancer. ... Sign up for …

vice.com

$4.69
OFF

Update: Judge Upholds $4.69 Billion Ovarian Cancer Verdict …

2 weeks from now

Judge Burlison, who oversaw the case of 22 women suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) for ovarian cancer from baby powder, ruled against a motion by J&J to overturn the verdict. J&J vowed to …

levinsimes.com

$55
OFF

Jury Links Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder To Ovarian Cancer

2 weeks from now

Allen, Allen, Allen & Allen, P.C. Call us at 1-866-388-1307. Practice Areas. Car Accidents ... A second civil lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson resulted in a $55 million award to a 62-year …

allenandallen.com

$4.69
OFF

Women Who Sued Johnson & Johnson Declare Victory After $4.69 …

2 weeks from now

Jul 20, 2018 · A woman who claimed her cancer was caused by using Johnson & Johnson's <JNJ.N> baby powder for decades said she believes justice was served after a jury found the …

reuters.com

$4.14
OFF

22 Women Win Talcum Powder Cancer Case - Medtruth

2 weeks from now

Aug 16, 2018 · The jury awarded the plaintiffs $4.14 billion in punitive damages as well as $550 million in compensatory damages after six weeks in the St. Louis Circuit Court. However, …

medtruth.com

$5
OFF

J&J Talc Group's Bid To Hire Big Law Firms Prompts DOJ Challenge

2 weeks from now

22 hours ago · Brown Rudnick LLP and Paul Hastings LLP can’t represent a talc claimants’ committee for Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt subsidiary unless they forgo around $5.6 …

bloomberglaw.com

FAQs about Woman Wins $417 Million in Suit Linking Baby Powder to Her Coupon?

What is a J&J lawsuit?

A J&J lawsuit refers to a legal action against Johnson & Johnson. In this case, women are suing the company over its talcum powder products allegedly causing cancer. ...

Does Johnson & Johnson powder cause ovarian cancer?

The council, which said that a "large proportion" of its members used Johnson & Johnson powder products and that "many have developed ovarian cancer as a result," hopes a court will force the company to inform the Black women who were the targets of its marketing efforts about the possible dangers of using the company's powder products. ...

Did Johnson & Johnson hire a 'curvy Southern woman'?

Johnson & Johnson later hired a firm that handed out 100,000 gift bags containing powder products at churches and other locations in Chicago, launched a radio campaign in the Southern U.S. targeting "curvy southern women" and considered signing Patti LaBelle or Aretha Franklin as a spokesperson, among other efforts, the suit says. ...

What happened to Johnson & Johnson baby powder?

Johnson & Johnson is ending production of its iconic talc-based Johnson’s Baby Powder, which has been embroiled in thousands of lawsuits claiming it caused cancer. The company says it will continue to vigorously defend itself in lawsuits involving the product. (Jeff Chiu/The Associated Press) ...

Did Johnson & Johnson sell baby powder to black women?

According to the lawsuit, an internal presentation from 2006 suggested that Johnson & Johnson market its powder products, which had been lagging in sales, toward "high propensity consumers" such as Black women. Data showed that 60% of Black women were using baby powder at that time, compared with just 30% of the overall population. ...

Why did Johnson & Johnson get rejected?

The rejection by the court is considered a setback for Johnson & Johnson, which has been trying to limit its exposure to tens of thousands of litigants in the U.S. and Canada. Class actions have been filed in both the U.S. and Canada. None have been settled or gone to trial where the allegations can be tested by a court. ...